In the previous post, I gave a little glimpse into derived functors and somewhat motivated their construction. In this post, we’ll get our hands dirty with homological algebra to continue setting up the required machinery and go through many proofs.

In the previous post, I promised to continue the proof of a lemma which establishes a long exact sequence. Before giving the proof, let me mention a few facts which will be useful.

If we’re given a short exact sequence in an abelian category where is an injective object. From the map and the monomorphism , we can extend to a map such that the composition is the identity. Using the Splitting Lemma, one obtains a non-canonical splitting . Applying ,

.

The identity map factors through the projection map , the same holds true after applying , in particular, the last map is surjective!

.

### Proof of Lemma 1:

#### Step 1:A morphism between objects with injective resolution induces a chain map between the resolutions

Let be a morphism between two objects with injective resolutions . In the figure below, the map is constructed from the fact that is a monomorphism and there is a map from to an injective object.

Now, there is a monomorphism . Next, note that by the commutativity of the square already defined, takes to by the fact that by exactness of the lower sequence. This means that the map induces a morphism and by exactness, we can compose this with to get a map . Since , we get the required map . Inductively continue this process to get the entire chain map. Note that all the maps defined from the injective object property are not unique.

#### Step 2:Proving that any two such extensions are chain-homotopic

Let be two chain maps from to .

Continue reading “A Road to the Grothendieck Spectral Sequence:Derived Functors II”